These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: An HPLC method for the pharmacokinetic study of vincristine sulfate-loaded PLGA-PEG nanoparticle formulations after injection to rats.
    Author: Chen J, He H, Li S, Shen Q.
    Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2011 Jul 01; 879(21):1967-72. PubMed ID: 21665557.
    Abstract:
    The aim of this study is to develop a simple and applicable HPLC method for the detection of vincristine in rat plasma after administration of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-poly(ethylene glycol) (PLGA-PEG) nanoparticles loaded with vincristine sulfate (VCR). Vincristine was extracted from rat plasma and vinblastine sulfate was chosen as the internal standard (IS). Chromatographic separation of VCR and IS was achieved by a Dikma Dimonsil C₁₈ column (200 mm×4.6 mm) with the mobile phase consisting of 0.02 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate-methanol (36:64, v/v, pH=4.7) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The ultraviolet detection wavelength was set at 276 nm. The calibration curve was linear over a concentration range of 0.05-5.0 μg/mL. The intra-day and inter-day accuracy for three quality controls (QC) samples was 93.48-107.74% and 92.61-96.58%, respectively; the precision was less than 9%. The average method recoveries for vincristine from spiked plasma at all QC levels were over 83%; and extraction recoveries were between 66 and 70%. Vincristine was stable in rat plasma for one month at -80°C, for 8 h at room temperature, as well as during three freeze-thaw cycles. This HPLC method was applied successfully to the pharmacokinetic study of vincristine in rats after a single intravenous injection of VCR in physiological saline (F-VCR) solution, VCR-loaded PLGA-mPEG nanoparticles with (NP1) and PLGA-PEG-folate nanoparticles (NP2) suspension, respectively. There were significant differences in main pharmacokinetic parameters between F-VCR and the nanoparticles. Both kinds of VCR-loaded nanoparticles displayed improved pharmacokinetic profiles.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]