These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A three-dimensional insight into the complexity of flow convergence in mitral regurgitation: adjunctive benefit of anatomic regurgitant orifice area.
    Author: Chandra S, Salgo IS, Sugeng L, Weinert L, Settlemier SH, Mor-Avi V, Lang RM.
    Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2011 Sep; 301(3):H1015-24. PubMed ID: 21666109.
    Abstract:
    Mitral effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) using the flow convergence (FC) method is used to quantify the severity of mitral regurgitation (MR). However, it is challenging and prone to interobserver variability in complex valvular pathology. We hypothesized that real-time three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (RT3D TEE) derived anatomic regurgitant orifice area (AROA) can be a reasonable adjunct, irrespective of valvular geometry. Our goals were to 1) to determine the regurgitant orifice morphology and distance suitable for FC measurement using 3D computational flow dynamics and finite element analysis (FEA), and (2) to measure AROA from RT3D TEE and compare it with 2D FC derived EROA measurements. We studied 61 patients. EROA was calculated from 2D TEE images using the 2D-FC technique, and AROA was obtained from zoomed RT3DE TEE acquisitions using prototype software. 3D computational fluid dynamics by FEA were applied to 3D TEE images to determine the effects of mitral valve (MV) orifice geometry on FC pattern. 3D FEA analysis revealed that a central regurgitant orifice is suitable for FC measurements at an optimal distance from the orifice but complex MV orifice resulting in eccentric jets yielded nonaxisymmetric isovelocity contours close to the orifice where the assumptions underlying FC are problematic. EROA and AROA measurements correlated well (r = 0.81) with a nonsignificant bias. However, in patients with eccentric MR, the bias was larger than in central MR. Intermeasurement variability was higher for the 2D FC technique than for RT3DE-based measurements. With its superior reproducibility, 3D analysis of the AROA is a useful alternative to quantify MR when 2D FC measurements are challenging.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]