These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Influence of mode of delivery on pelvic organ support 6 months postpartum.
    Author: Diez-Itza I, Arrue M, Ibañez L, Paredes J, Murgiondo A, Sarasqueta C.
    Journal: Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 72(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 21709395.
    Abstract:
    AIMS: The aims of this study were to describe pelvic organ support 6 months postpartum among women who delivered by cesarean section, spontaneous and instrumental vaginal delivery, and to evaluate the differences between the groups. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 382 primigravid women who gave birth at Donostia Hospital during 2007. Pelvic organ support was explored 6 months postpartum using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) system. Joint hypermobility, height and weight were also assessed. RESULTS: POPQ stage ≥II was present in 7.7, 18.1 and 29.0% of women who delivered by cesarean section, spontaneous and instrumental vaginal delivery, respectively. Spontaneous vaginal delivery increased the risk by more than three times (OR 3.19; 95% CI 1.07-9.49) while instrumental vaginal delivery increased it more than fivefold (OR 5.52; 95% CI 1.79-17.30) in comparison with cesarean section. Instrument-assisted delivery did not increase the risk of prolapse in women who delivered vaginally. CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean section is associated with a lower prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse after delivery. Instrument- assisted delivery is not associated with an increased risk of postpartum prolapse among women who delivered vaginally.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]