These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Predictors of mortality following severe pelvic ring fracture: results of a population-based study.
    Author: Gabbe BJ, de Steiger R, Esser M, Bucknill A, Russ MK, Cameron PA.
    Journal: Injury; 2011 Oct; 42(10):985-91. PubMed ID: 21733513.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Traumatic disruption of the pelvic ring is uncommon but is associated with a high risk of mortality. These injuries are predominantly due to high energy blunt trauma such as a fall from height, road or workplace trauma, and severe associated injuries are prevalent, increasing the complexity of managing this patient group. The aim of this population-based study was to investigate predictors of mortality following severe pelvic ring fractures managed in an inclusive, regionalised trauma system. METHODS: Cases aged≥15 years from 1st July 2001 to 30th June 2008 were extracted from the population-based statewide Victorian State Trauma Registry for analysis. Patient demographic, prehospital and admission characteristics were considered as potential predictors of mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of mortality with adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated. RESULTS: There were 348 cases over the 8-year period. The mortality rate was 19%. Patients aged≥65 years were at higher odds of mortality (AOR 7.6, 95% CI: 2.8, 20.4) than patients aged 15-34 years. Patients hypotensive at the scene (AOR 5.5, 95% CI: 2.3, 13.2), and on arrival at the definitive hospital of care (AOR 3.7, 955 CI: 1.7, 8.0), were more likely to die than patients without hypotension. The presence of a severe chest injury was associated with an increased odds of mortality (AOR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.3, 6.1), whilst patients injured in intentional events were also more likely to die than patients involved in unintentional events (AOR 4.9, 95% CI: 1.6, 15.6). There was no association between the hospital of definitive management and mortality after adjustment for other variables, despite differences in the protocols for managing these patients at the major trauma services (Level 1 trauma centres). CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the importance of effective control of haemodynamic instability for reducing the risk of mortality. As most patients survive these injuries, further research should focus on long term morbidity and the impact of different treatment approaches.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]