These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: In-shoe plantar pressure measurements for patients with knee osteoarthritis: Reliability and effects of lateral heel wedges.
    Author: Leitch KM, Birmingham TB, Jones IC, Giffin JR, Jenkyn TR.
    Journal: Gait Posture; 2011 Jul; 34(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 21741243.
    Abstract:
    Although plantar pressure measurement systems are being used increasingly during gait analyses to investigate foot orthotics, there is limited information describing test-retest reliability of such measurements. Objectives of this study were to (1) examine the test-retest reliability of lateral heel pressure (LHP) and centre of pressure (COP) during walking with and without lateral heel wedges, and (2) evaluate the effects of 4° and 8° lateral heel wedges on the magnitude of LHP, the pathway of the COP and the peak external knee adduction moment (KAM) in subjects with and without knee osteoarthritis (OA). Twenty-six subjects, 12 patients with knee OA and 14 healthy subjects, were evaluated during three lateral heel wedge conditions (control, 4° and 8°) with standardized footwear. Three-dimensional analyses of gait with optical motion capture, floor-mounted force plate and in-shoe plantar pressure were completed on two occasions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(2, 1)) for LHP were excellent (0.79-0.83) while ICCs for COP in the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions were more variable (0.66-0.86). Reliability was slightly diminished when using heel wedges. Standard errors of measurement suggested considerable day-to-day variability in an individual's measures. Lateral heel wedges significantly (p<0.001) increased LHP, shifted COP anteriorly and laterally, and decreased the KAM. No significant differences were observed between subjects with and without OA. Although the day-to-day variability appears too large to confidently evaluate changes in individual patients, and decreases in reliability with increases in wedge size indicate caution, these results suggest in-shoe measurement of LHP and COP are appropriate for use in studies evaluating biomechanical effects of foot orthoses for knee OA.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]