Title: Short-term lower leg growth in 5- to 11-year-old asthmatic children using beclomethasone dipropionate inhalers with chlorofluorocarbon or hydrofluoroalkane propellants: a 9-week, open-label, randomized, crossover, noninferiority study. Author: Wolthers OD, Walters EG. Journal: Clin Ther; 2011 Aug; 33(8):1069-76. PubMed ID: 21784529. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Beclomethasone dipropionate-hydrofluoroalkane (BDP-HFA) is a non-chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-propelled metered dose inhaler. Data is needed to support the registration of BDP-HFA in pediatric populations for countries in the European Union. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess short-term lower leg growth in children with asthma during treatment with BDP-HFA 100 μg BID compared with BDP-CFC 200 μg BID. METHODS: Children with asthma were included in this open-label, randomized, crossover study with 2-week run-in, active treatment, and washout periods. Lower leg length was measured every second week. As a secondary outcome parameter, 24-hour urine was collected for assessment of free cortisol. Interventions were inhaled BDP-HFA 100 μg BID with AeroChamber Plus spacer and BDP-CFC 200 μg BID with Volumatic spacer. RESULTS: In 63 patients with asthma aged 5 to 11 years, BDP-HFA 100 μg BID was noninferior to BDP-CFC 200 μg BID, as the lower margin of CI (-0.03 to 0.10 mm/wk) of the estimated difference (0.03 mm/wk) was greater than the prespecified lower limit for noninferiority of -0.12 mm/wk. Mean (SD) lower leg growth rate during run-in, BDP-HFA 100 μg BID, and BDP-CFC 200 μg BID was 0.36 (0.17), 0.27 (0.21), and 0.23 (0.18) mm/wk, respectively (BDP-HFA estimate of difference, -0.09 [95% CI, -0.16 to -0.03 mm/wk; P < 0.01]; BDP-CFC estimate of difference, -0.13 [95% CI, -0.19 to -0.06 mm/wk; P < 0.001]). No statistically significant differences were seen in urinary free cortisol assessments. Eight and 6 mild to moderate adverse events in 10 children were reported during treatment with BDP-HFA and BDP-CFC, respectively. One event in each group was judged to be probably related to the study medication; no others were judged to be related. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences were found in lower leg growth between BDP-HFA 100 μg BID with AeroChamber Plus spacer and BDP-CFC 200 μg BID with Volumatic spacer during 2-week treatment. Evidence of differences in systemic activity between the treatments was not found. EudraCT registration: 2007-007455-14.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]
