These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Ampicillin/sulbactam versus clindamycin in the treatment of postpartum endomyometritis.
    Author: Martens MG, Faro S, Hammill HA, Smith D, Riddle G, Maccato M.
    Journal: South Med J; 1990 Apr; 83(4):408-13. PubMed ID: 2181689.
    Abstract:
    Sixty-eight patients with postpartum endomyometritis were enrolled in this open randomized comparative study. Forty-two patients received ampicillin/sulbactam and 26 received clindamycin. The cure rates were similar in the two groups: 83% in the ampicillin/sulbactam group and 88% in the clindamycin group. The most frequent endometrial bacterial isolates were Bacteroides bivius, Streptococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, and Ureaplasma urealyticum. Bacteremia was present in 15 of 68 (22%), the most frequent isolates being Mycoplasma (four cases) and B bivius (three cases). Clindamycin-resistant species were S faecalis, E coli, and Proteus mirabilis. There were seven treatment failures in the ampicillin/sulbactam group; only one isolate (an E coli) was resistant to ampicillin/sulbactam. In a significant number of these failures, Mycoplasma was isolated. Ampicillin/sulbactam and clindamycin were found to be equally efficacious in the treatment of postpartum endometritis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]