These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Liver transplantation for variceal hemorrhage.
    Author: Wood RP, Shaw BW, Rikkers LF.
    Journal: Surg Clin North Am; 1990 Apr; 70(2):449-61. PubMed ID: 2181711.
    Abstract:
    At the present time, liver transplantation must be considered among the treatment options for patients with variceal hemorrhage. For a significant percentage of variceal bleeders throughout the world, however, transplantation is not a viable option either because the patient is not an appropriate transplant candidate or because of the etiology of the patient's portal hypertension. Sclerotherapy and portosystemic shunts remain the mainstay of therapy for these patients. The survival rates with liver transplantation are superior to those reported for other therapies for variceal hemorrhage in patients who have moderate or severe liver disease in addition to variceal hemorrhage. Child's C patients whose variceal hemorrhage is controlled medically should be evaluated for transplantation and receive chronic sclerotherapy while they wait on the transplant list. If the variceal hemorrhage cannot be controlled medically in a transplant candidate, then the patient should undergo an emergency shunt procedure. The shunt of choice is a large-bore H-graft mesocaval or mesorenal shunt. This shunt effectively controls the acute hemorrhage, is relatively simple to perform, does not adversely impact on the subsequent liver transplant, and can simply be ligated after the transplant is completed. Patients who experience variceal hemorrhage as the only manifestation of their liver disease should be treated initially with endoscopic sclerotherapy. For that small group of patients who are either not candidates for sclerotherapy or who rebleed despite sclerotherapy, the choice of shunt or transplantation is presently a difficult one, because both therapies provide excellent results in this group of patients. The choice of therapy should be made on an individual basis and only after consultation with both transplant and shunt surgeons. If a shunt is chosen, we prefer the DSRS because it maintains hepatic portal perfusion in many patients and does not require dissection of the porta hepatis. The management of patients with a prior portosystemic shunt at the time of transplantation depends on the type of shunt and the duration of time between the shunt and the transplant. Shunts not involving the hepatic hilum have little adverse impact on the performance of the transplant. There are insufficient data to assess accurately the effect of a prior portacaval shunt on the transplant. However, our clinical experience and that of other transplant groups indicate that the transplantation of these patients is technically more difficult than that of patients with shunts not involving the hilum. With the availability of other shunting procedures that do not involve extensive dissection of the hepatic hilum, there is little role for either end-to-side or side-to-side portacaval shunts in patients who are potential liver transplant candidates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]