These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled crossover study to determine the anti-pruritic efficacy, safety and local dermal tolerability of a topical formulation (srd174 cream) of the long-acting opiod antagonist nalmefene in subjects with atopic dermatitis.
    Author: Herzog JL, Solomon JA, Draelos Z, Fleischer A, Stough D, Wolf DI, Abramovits W, Werschler W, Green E, Duffy M, Rothaul A, Tansley R.
    Journal: J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Aug; 10(8):853-60. PubMed ID: 21818506.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of topical nalmefene (SRD174), a long acting opioid antagonist for the management of pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis (AD). DESIGN: Double-blind, vehicle-controlled, randomized, cross-over trial. SETTING: Eleven dermatology outpatient clinics in the U.S. PATIENTS: Sixty-two out of 136 screened adult subjects with confirmed AD affecting is less than or equal to 20% of body surface area and with moderate-to-severe pruritus. INTERVENTIONS: SRD174 cream or matching vehicle cream applied as required during two 7-day periods separated by a wash-out period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary efficacy variable was the period mean of the sum of pruritus intensity difference (SPID) from 0 to 4 hours (SPID0-4) where pruritus was measured on a 0-100 scale Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at seven pre-specified time-points following study drug application. A range of secondary efficacy, safety and tolerance endpoints were included. RESULTS: The LS means for the SPID0-4 (± SD) for SRD174 cream and Vehicle were 210.7 (20.4) and 212.1 (20.2), respectively (Difference = -1.3 (95% CI: -25.9, 23.3). None of the secondary efficacy endpoints tested demonstrated a statistically significant or clinically important difference between the test product and the vehicle. Overall, the SRD174 cream was well tolerated although there was a higher incidence of AEs when subjects took SRD174 cream (22, 36.7 percent of subjects) compared with when they were taking vehicle (14, 23.3 percent of subjects). CONCLUSIONS: SRD174 cream did not demonstrate efficacy in the treatment of pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis raising questions on the role of peripheral opioid receptors as a target for the treatment of pruritus in this population.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]