These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Feasibility of initiating extracorporeal life support during mechanical chest compression CPR: a porcine pilot study.
    Author: Menegazzi JJ, Salcido DD, Housler GJ, Logue ES.
    Journal: Resuscitation; 2012 Jan; 83(1):130-3. PubMed ID: 21835144.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Recently, portable extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) machines have become commercially available. This creates the potential to utilize extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for the treatment of sudden cardiac arrest in the emergency department, and potentially in the out-of-hospital setting. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the feasibility of installing the ECMO circuit during delivery of mechanical chest compression CPR. METHODS: We used 5 mixed-breed domestic swine with a mean mass of 26.0 kg. After induction of anesthesia, animals were instrumented with micromanometer-tipped transducers placed in the aorta and right atrium via the left femoral artery and vein. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced electrically with a transthoracic shock and left untreated for 8 min. Then, mechanical chest compressions were begun (LUCAS, Jolife, Lund, Sweden) and manual ventilations were performed to maintain ETCO(2) between 35 and 45Torr. Compressions continued until ECMO flow was started. Ten minutes after induction of VF, drugs were given (epinephrine, vasopressin, and propranolol). ECMO installation was started via cutdown on the right external jugular vein and right femoral artery for placement of venous and arterial catheters while chest compressions continued. ECMO installation start time varied from 17 to 30 min after start of compressions and continued until ECG indicated a shockable rhythm. First rescue shocks were given at 22, 32, 35, 44, and 65 min. RESULTS: ECMO was successfully installed in all five animals without incident. It was necessary to briefly discontinue chest compressions during the most delicate part of inserting the catheters into the vessels. ECMO also allowed for very rapid cooling of the animals and facilitated post-resuscitation hemodynamic support. Only the 65-min animal did not attain return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). CONCLUSION: Mechanical chest compression may be a suitable therapeutic bridge to the installation of ECMO and does not interfere with ECMO catheter placement.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]