These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Implant-retained dentures for full-arch rehabilitation: a case report comparing fixed and removable restorations.
    Author: Zafiropoulos GG, Hoffman O.
    Journal: Gen Dent; 2011; 59(4):e137-43. PubMed ID: 21903551.
    Abstract:
    Dental implants as abutments for full-arch restorations are a well-documented treatment modality. This report presents a case in which the patient was treated initially with fixed restorations supported by either implants or natural teeth and subsequently treated with a removable implant/telescopic crown-supported overdenture. Advantages and disadvantages of each approach are described and discussed. While the fixed restoration resulted in a functionally satisfactory treatment outcome, the patient was displeased with the esthetic appearance. The main concern was the unnaturally long tooth shape necessary to compensate for the insufficient alveolar ridge height. Replacement of the existing restoration with an implant-supported removable overdenture led to a functionally and esthetically acceptable result. When deciding whether to use a fixed or removable implant-supported full-arch restoration, a multitude of factors must be considered. Due to the possible need for additional surgical steps to enhance the esthetic appearance surrounding fixed restorations, removable implant-supported partial dentures often are the better choice.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]