These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Impact of cholecalciferol treatment on biomarkers of inflammation and myocardial structure in hemodialysis patients without hyperparathyroidism.
    Author: Bucharles S, Barberato SH, Stinghen AEM, Gruber B, Piekala L, Dambiski AC, Custodio MR, Pecoits-Filho R.
    Journal: J Ren Nutr; 2012 Mar; 22(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 21908203.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D, 25(OH)D) deficiency, hypovitaminosis D, is highly prevalent in chronic kidney disease patients and is potentially involved with complications in the hemodialysis (HD) population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of cholecalciferol supplementation on biomarkers of mineral metabolism, inflammation, and cardiac function in a group of HD patients presenting with hypovitaminosis D and low intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels. MATERIAL AND METHODS: HD patients with iPTH levels of <300 pg/mL, not receiving vitamin D therapy, and presenting with 25(OH)D levels of <30 ng/mL were enrolled in this prospective study. Oral cholecalciferol was prescribed once a week in the first 12 weeks (50,000 IU) and in the last 12 weeks (20,000 IU) of the study. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and serum albumin were used as inflammatory markers. Echocardiograms were performed on a midweek interdialytic day at baseline and after 6 months of cholecalciferol supplementation. RESULTS: In all, 30 patients were included in the final analysis. We observed a significant increase in serum 25(OH)D levels after 3 months (46.2 ± 14.4 ng/mL vs. 18.1 ± 6.6 ng/mL; P < .001) and after 6 months (40.4 ± 10.4 ng/mL vs. 18.1 ± 6.6 ng/mL; P < .001) of cholecalciferol supplementation. There were no significant changes in alkaline phosphatase, iPTH, phosphorus, and serum albumin levels, but there was a slight but significant increase in calcium levels after 6 months of cholecalciferol supplementation (9.4 ± 0.6 mg/dL vs. 9.0 ± 0.6 mg/dL; P = .02). Additionally, we observed a significant reduction in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels after 3 months (median: 0.62 [0.05 to 29.6] mg/L vs. 0.32 [0.02 to 3.13] mg/L; P = .02) and after 6 months (median: 0.62 [0.05 to 29.6] mg/L vs. 0.50 [0.02 to 5.66] mg/L; P = .04) of cholecalciferol supplementation, as well as a significant reduction in interleukin-6 levels (median: 6.44 pg/mL vs. 3.83 pg/mL; P = .018) after 6 months of supplementation. Left ventricular mass index was significantly reduced at the end of supplementation (159 ± 55 g/m(2) vs. 175 ± 63 g/m(2); P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Cholecalciferol supplementation in HD patients was found to be safe and efficient to correct hypovitaminosis D and established little impact on mineral metabolism markers. Additionally, we observed a reduction in important surrogate markers of cardiovascular risk, namely systemic inflammation and left ventricular hypertrophy, suggesting an anti-inflammatory action and possibly an improvement of cardiac dysfunction.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]