These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Correlation of transcranial Doppler and noninvasive tests with angiography in the evaluation of extracranial carotid disease. Author: Cantelmo NL, Babikian VL, Johnson WC, Samaraweera R, Hyde C, Pochay VE. Journal: J Vasc Surg; 1990 Jun; 11(6):786-91; discussion 791-2. PubMed ID: 2193175. Abstract: To evaluate the usefulness of transcranial Doppler sonography in determining severity of extracranial carotid disease, we compared transcranial Doppler, ocular pneumoplethysmography, Doppler spectral analysis, and duplex scanning data to information derived from cerebral angiography. Fifty-one consecutive patients with unilateral extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis or occlusion were selected. Transcranial Doppler indexes included the peak systolic flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery ipsilateral to the stenosed internal carotid artery (iMCAFV), the difference between the peak systolic flow velocities in the middle cerebral artery ipsilateral and contralateral to the stenosed internal carotid artery (dMCAFV), and the peak systolic flow velocity in the anterior cerebral artery contralateral to the stenosed internal carotid artery (cACAFV). The minimal residual lumen determined angiographically was used as the index of internal carotid artery stenosis. Linear regression analysis with minimal residual lumen as the dependent variable and transcranial Doppler and noninvasive tests as independent variables showed the following correlation coefficients: (1) dMCAFV and cACAFV, R2 = 0.3170; (2) ocular pneumoplethysmography, R2 = 0.4798; (3) dMCAFV, cACAFV, delta ocular pneumoplethysmography, duplex scanning, and spectral analysis R2 = 0.6382; (4) ocular pneumoplethysmography, duplex scanning, and spectral analysis, R2 = 0.6491; (5) iMCAFV, no association. These results were supported by sensitivity and specificity as well as bivariate analysis. We conclude that transcranial Doppler did not significantly add to the information obtained by our noninvasive battery of tests in the evaluation of unilateral extracranial carotid disease.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]