These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of invasive and non-invasive measurements of haemodynamic parameters in patients with advanced heart failure.
    Author: Sokolski M, Rydlewska A, Krakowiak B, Biegus J, Zymlinski R, Banasiak W, Jankowska EA, Ponikowski P.
    Journal: J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Nov; 12(11):773-8. PubMed ID: 21941196.
    Abstract:
    AIM: Measurement of haemodynamic parameters using a Swan-Ganz catheter is of clinical importance in patients with advanced heart failure; however, its applicability is limited due to its invasiveness. The aim of the study was to estimate the concordance between invasive and non-invasive measurements of haemodynamic parameters in patients with advanced heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 25 patients with advanced heart failure (20 men, age: 64 ± 11 years, New York Heart Association class III/IV: 88/12%, left ventricular ejection fraction: 37 ± 20%), 13 (52%) demonstrated decompensated heart failure. Resting haemodynamic parameters were measured simultaneously using two methods: an invasive Swan-Ganz catheterization and a thermodilution technique; and a non-invasive recording using a device for finger arterial pressure waveform analysis. The following parameters were analysed: stroke volume (SV, ml), cardiac output (CO, l/min) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR, dyne × s/cm⁵). The concordance between these two methods was assessed using the variability coefficient calculated according to a Bland-Altman method. Comparing the invasive and non-invasive measures, variability coefficients were: 13, 18 and 11% for SV, SVR and CO, respectively. Similar variability coefficients were obtained when invasive and non-invasive measurements were compared in prespecified subgroups of patients, distinguished based on the presence of decompensation, atrial fibrillation and values of SBP. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of haemodynamic parameters using a non-invasive method based on a pressure pulse contour model reveals an adequate concordance with the measures obtained using an invasive approach. Our results suggest that a non-invasive method for haemodynamic monitoring could be applied in clinical practice in patients with advanced heart failure.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]