These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Growth hormone regimens in Australia: analysis of the first 3 years of treatment for idiopathic growth hormone deficiency and idiopathic short stature.
    Author: Hughes IP, Harris M, Choong CS, Ambler G, Cutfield W, Hofman P, Cowell CT, Werther G, Cotterill A, Davies PS, Australasian Paediatric Endocrine Group (APEG).
    Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2012 Jul; 77(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 21950731.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate response to growth hormone (GH) in the first, second and third years of treatment for all idiopathic GH-deficient (GHD) and idiopathic short stature (ISS) patients in Australia. CONTEXT: Eligibility for subsidized GH treatment in Australia is determined on auxological criteria for the indication of Short Stature and Slow Growth (SSSG), which includes ISS (SSSG-ISS). The biochemical GHD (BGHD, peak GH < 10 mU/l) and SSSG indications are treated similarly: starting dose of 4·5 mg/m(2)/week with provision for incremental dosing. Some ISS patients were specifically diagnosed with familial short stature (SSSG-FSS). DESIGN: Responses for each year of treatment for BGHD, SSSG-ISS and SSSG-FSS cohorts were compared in relation to influencing variables and with international benchmarks. The effect of incremental dosing was assessed. PATIENTS: Australian BGHD, SSSG-ISS and SSSG-FSS patients who had completed 1, 2, or 3 years of treatment and were currently receiving GH. MEASUREMENTS: Growth hormone dose, change in height-standard deviation score (ΔSDS) and growth velocity (GV). RESULTS: First-year response was 2-3 times greater than that in subsequent years: ΔSDS(1st year) = 0·92, 0·50 and 0·46 for BGHD, SSSG-ISS and SSSG-FSS, respectively. Responses were similar to international reports and inversely related to age at commencement of GH. First-year GV-for-age for BGHD patients was similar to international standards for idiopathic GHD. However, girls had an inferior response to boys when treatment commenced at <6 years of age. First-year GV-for-age for SSSG-ISS/FSS patients was less than ISS standards. Dose increments attenuated the first- to second-year decline in response to BGHD but marginally improved the responses for SSSG-ISS/FSS. CONCLUSIONS: The Australian auxology-based GH programme produces comparable responses to international programmes. A lower starting dose is offset by the initiation of treatment at younger ages. Incremental dosing does not appear optimal. A first-year dose of 6·4-6·9 mg/m(2)/week for GHD and 8·9 mg/m(2)/week for ISS with early commencement of GH treatment may be most efficacious.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]