These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Telephone counseling and attendance in a national mammography-screening program a randomized controlled trial.
    Author: Hegenscheid K, Hoffmann W, Fochler S, Domin M, Weiss S, Hartmann B, Bick U, Hosten N.
    Journal: Am J Prev Med; 2011 Oct; 41(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 21961470.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: In Germany, a mammography-screening program (MSP) was implemented on a national level. It complies with all criteria of the European guidelines for quality assurance in screening mammography; however, the attendance rate is 54%, falling short of the target attendance rate of 70%. The aim of this study was to investigate whether additional telephone counseling improves attendance among nonresponders and the level of satisfaction with telephone counseling. DESIGN: In a prospective RCT, women identified as nonresponders in the MSP were randomized to a control group that received written reminders or to an intervention group that additionally received telephone counseling. In a follow-up, a subset of the intervention group was contacted by telephone regarding their satisfaction with telephone counseling. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: In 2008, a total of 5477 women aged 50-69 years who were eligible for the German MSP but had not participated up to 6 weeks after the first invitation were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Individual telephone counseling consisted of scripted calls from a trained counselor who provided information on MSP and answered the woman's questions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Report of mammography use provided by the screening unit 3 months after the reminder was sent. RESULTS: Analysis was conducted in 2009. Comparison of screening attendance revealed a significantly higher attendance rate in the intervention group compared with controls (29.7% vs 26.1%, p=0.0035). When only women for whom telephone numbers were available were analyzed, attendance was even better (35.5% vs 29.7%, p=0.0004). In the follow-up, 278 of 404 women were actually surveyed. Of those, 33% stated that telephone counseling had influenced their decision, 56% stated that they had undergone screening mammography, and 77% agreed that personal telephone counseling should be used routinely to encourage nonresponders to go for screening. CONCLUSIONS: Individual telephone counseling for nonresponders to a national program for breast cancer screening was well accepted by participants and effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12611000645954.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]