These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effectiveness of abdominal cerclage placed via laparotomy or laparoscopy: systematic review.
    Author: Burger NB, Brölmann HA, Einarsson JI, Langebrekke A, Huirne JA.
    Journal: J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(6):696-704. PubMed ID: 22024258.
    Abstract:
    Preterm delivery remains a primary cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. One cause of preterm birth is cervical incompetence. In women with a shortened or absent cervix or in those in whom previous vaginal cerclage failed, abdominal cerclage may be recommended. We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database. Thirty-one eligible studies were selected. Six studies (135 patients) reported on the laparoscopic approach, and 26 (1116 patients) on the abdominal approach. Delivery of a viable infant at 34 weeks of gestation or more varied from 78.5% (laparoscopic) to 84.8% (abdominal). Second-trimester fetal loss occurred in 8.1% (laparoscopic) vs 7.8% (abdominal), with no reported third-trimester losses (laparoscopic) vs 1.2% (abdominal). We conclude that abdominal cerclage is associated with excellent results as treatment of cervical incompetence, with high fetal survival rates and minimal complications during surgery and pregnancy. Further studies are needed to differentiate which method is superior.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]