These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Smoking, occupational risk factors, and bronchial tumor location: a possible impact for lung cancer computed tomography scan screening.
    Author: Gonzalez M, Vignaud JM, Clement-Duchene C, Luc A, Wild P, Bertrand O, Thiberville L, Martinet Y, Benichou J, Paris C.
    Journal: J Thorac Oncol; 2012 Jan; 7(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 22031233.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to describe associations between lung tumor location and smoking as well as selected occupational exposures. In the context of lung cancer screening by computed tomography scan, tumor location may have an interest. Computed tomography scan is known to better detect more peripheral tumors. METHODS: Lung cancer cases diagnosed in two French University hospitals between 1997 and 2009 were included. Tumors visible on white-light bronchoscopy were defined as central. Occupational exposures were assessed by the same expert. Data were analyzed by case-case comparisons using unconditional logistic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 1701 cases were included, comprising mainly men (86.3%), current smokers (52.8%), or former smokers (42.8%). Main histological subtypes of cancer were adenocarcinomas (33.8%) and squamous cell carcinomas (32.6%). The tumor location was found to be central in 61% of cases, and never smokers and women had more often peripheral tumors. Exposure to asbestos was significantly associated with central location with dose-response relationship (odds ratio [OR] for peripheral tumors = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.70) for the highest level of exposure. Exposure to silica dust was significantly associated with peripheral tumor (OR for peripheral tumors = 3.28, 95%CI 1.50-7.17) for the highest level of exposure. Exposure to welding fumes was associated with central location (OR for peripheral tumors = 0.51, 95% CI 0.26-0.96) for the first level of exposure). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking characteristics and occupational exposures have to be considered to define more accurately high-risk populations suitable for lung cancer screening or early detection programs.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]