These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Use of electronic probes for classifying lamb carcasses.
    Author: Kirton AH, Mercer GJ, Duganzich DM, Uljee AE.
    Journal: Meat Sci; 1995; 39(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 22059823.
    Abstract:
    Three commercially available electronic lamb carcass grading probes (Hennessy Grading Probe, AUS-Meat Sheep Probe, Swedish FTC Lamb Probe) and one developmental probe (Ruakura GR lamb probe) were assessed for accuracy and suitability for use on-line on the lamb dressing chain for objectively classifying lamb carcasses. GR is the total tissue thickness over the 12th rib taken at a distance 11 cm from the mid-line, used to define fatness in lamb carcass grading in New Zealand. Probe measurements were compared with manually measured GR (sometimes used at present) and Toland probe measurements (total tissue depth between the ribs) for accuracy of predicting both GR on the right side of the carcass and also carcass water (indicating muscle) and fat content. Probes were tested on six occasions, each having approximately 50 lambs. All probes combined with carcass weight accounted for over 70% of the variation (R(2)) of GR right, with GR left accounting for 92% of the variation of GR right. Inclusion of a quadratic probe term was not quite as useful as inclusion of carcass weight for predicting GR right. The three commercial electronic probes individually when combined with carcass weight could account for 36-49% of the variation in the percentage of water and fat in the carcass, with the manual GR probe (right) on the chilled carcass accounting for 55% of the variation in water and 58% of the variation in fat percentages. Chilled carcass measurements are expected to give better results than readings on hot carcasses. The use of a quadratic probe coefficient instead of carcass weight with the probe readings gave similar accuracy of prediction of carcass composition. There was little difference between the two sides in the accuracy of prediction. Small differences were found between regressions relating probe readings to GR and composition for the different probing occasions. The electronic probe results from this trial are consistent with overseas results where probes are in use for objectively grading the carcasses of meat animals.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]