These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Polyelectrolyte LbL microcapsules versus PLGA microparticles for immunization with a protein antigen. Author: De Temmerman ML, Rejman J, Vandenbroucke RE, De Koker S, Libert C, Grooten J, Demeester J, Gander B, De Smedt SC. Journal: J Control Release; 2012 Mar 10; 158(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 22063002. Abstract: The transition from organism-based traditional vaccines to the use of safer subunit vaccines has implemented the use of adjuvants to enhance immunogenicity. This study compares the potential of two types of polymeric microparticles as delivery systems for the model antigen ovalbumin. The delivery systems encompassed polyelectrolyte microcapsules, assembled via Layer-by-Layer technology, and PLGA microparticles fabricated by spray-drying. Mice were immunized subcutaneously either by a single injection or by two injections separated by four weeks with an equivalent dose of the OVA-loaded particles. Both particulate formulations mediated high, long-term IgG(1) responses whereas the IgG(2c) titers remained low. Additionally, Th1 and Th2 phenotype immune responses against OVA were assessed by quantifying the production of cytokines in CD4+ T-cells derived from the spleens of immunized mice at 6 months after the first injection. Immunization with particulate formulations led to significantly increased IL-2, IL-4, IL-10 and IFN-γ production by splenic CD4+ T-cells compared to control animals. LbL microcapsules and PLGA microparticles generated strong immune responses in vivo, characterized by a mixed Th1/Th2 type response with predominance of Th2 immunity. Both particulate formulations elicited a comparable type of immune response and appear to be promising for antigen delivery.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]