These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Treatment outcomes of pulpotomy in primary molars using two endodontic biomaterials. A 2-year randomised clinical trial. Author: Malekafzali B, Shekarchi F, Asgary S. Journal: Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2011 Sep; 12(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 22077689. Abstract: AIM: To compare the treatment outcomes of calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) as pulp dressing biomaterials in vital pulpotomy of carious primary molars. STUDY DESIGN: split-mouth randomised clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty children aged 4-8 years with 2 carious teeth requiring pulpotomy were selected and randomly assigned to MTA (n = 40) or CEM (n = 40) groups. After coronal pulp removal, the remaining radicular pulp was covered with an appropriate biomaterial; the teeth were then permanently restored. Clinical/radiographic success/failures were blindly evaluated at 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-ups. STATISTICS: the recorded data were analyzed with McNemar test and GEE. RESULTS: A total of 36, 33 and 35 patients were available for 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-ups, respectively. At the 12-month follow-up only one and three teeth in the CEM and MTA groups had pathologic external root resorption, respectively. The resorbed teeth were then missed due to extraction/exfoliation at the 24-month follow-up; all other treated teeth were sign/symptom-free. Overall, clinical and radiographic outcomes in both MTA/CEM groups were comparable at the three follow-ups without significant differences. Time had no significant effect on the success. CONCLUSION: MTA and CEM demonstrated favourable treatment outcomes for pulpotomy of carious primary molars; CEM may be an effective pulp dressing biomaterial.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]