These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Clinical comparison of new monoclonal antibody-based nephelometric assays for free light chain kappa and lambda to polyclonal antibody-based assays and immunofixation electrophoresis.
    Author: Hoedemakers RM, Pruijt JF, Hol S, Teunissen E, Martens H, Stam P, Melsert R, Te Velthuis H.
    Journal: Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Nov 23; 50(3):489-95. PubMed ID: 22098433.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: New monoclonal antibody-based assays for serum-free light chains (FLC) have become available. METHODS: In a clinical study with 541 patients, the new N Latex FLC assays were compared with the Freelite FLC assays and immunofixation electrophoresis (IF). RESULTS: Comparison of the different FLC kappa (κ) assays showed a slope of 0.99 with a deviation of 5.0%, rs=0.92, for FLC lambda (λ) a slope of 1.22, deviation 13.8%, rs=0.90 and for the κ/λ ratio a slope of 0.72, deviation -4.6%, rs=0.72. The concordance for the FLC κ assays was 91%, for FLC λ 85% and κ/λ ratio 95%. The clinical sensitivity and specificity of the κ/λ ratios in the study were comparable: 60% and 99% for the N Latex FLC assay and 61% and 97% for the Freelite assay. In IF-FLC positive samples, the N Latex FLC κ/λ ratio scored 20/23 (87%) samples outside the reference range and Freelite 21/23 (91%). For IF-FLC negative samples, N Latex FLC assay κ/λ ratio scored 338/350 (97%) within the reference range and Freelite scored 332/350 (95%). CONCLUSIONS: The concordance scores and the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the new N Latex FLC assays and Freelite assays appeared comparable, but there are some differences in measurement of concentrations between the methods.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]