These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Accuracy of b-GGT fraction for the diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Author: Franzini M, Fornaciari I, Fierabracci V, Elawadi HA, Bolognesi V, Maltinti S, Ricchiuti A, De Bortoli N, Marchi S, Pompella A, Passino C, Emdin M, Paolicchi A. Journal: Liver Int; 2012 Apr; 32(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 22098947. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Serum gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) activity is a sensitive but non-specific marker of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Recently, four GGT fractions (big-, medium-, small-, free-GGT) were described in humans. AIM: We aimed to investigate whether a specific GGT fraction pattern is associated with NAFLD. METHODS: Gamma-glutamyltransferase fractions were determined in patients with NAFLD (n = 90), and compared with those in control subjects (n = 70), and chronic hepatitis C (CHC, n = 45) age and gender matched. RESULTS: Total GGT was elevated in NAFLD as compared to controls (median, 25°-75° percentile: 39.4, 20.0-82.0 U/L vs. 18.4, 13.2-24.9 U/L respectively, P < 0.001). All fractions were higher in NAFLD than in controls (P < 0.001). The b-GGT showed the highest diagnostic accuracy for NAFLD diagnosis [area under ROC curve (ROC-AUC): 0.85; cut-off 2.6 U/L, sensitivity 74%, specificity 81%]. Also subjects with CHC showed increased GGT (41.5, 21.9-84.5 U/L, P < 0.001 vs. controls, P = n.s. vs. NAFLD), as well as m-, s-, and f-GGT, while b-GGT did not show any significant increase (P = n.s. vs. HS, P < 0.001 vs. NAFLD). In subjects with CHC, s-GGT showed the best diagnostic value (ROC-AUC: 0.853; cut-off 14.1 U/L, sensitivity 73%, specificity 90%). Serum GGT did not show any value in the differential diagnosis between NAFLD and CHC (ROC-AUC 0.507, P = n.s.), while b-GGT/s-GGT ratio showed the highest diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing NAFLD and CHC (ROC-AUC: 0.93; cut-off value 0.16, sensitivity 82%, specificity 90%). CONCLUSIONS: b-GGT increases in NAFLD, but not in CHC. GGT fraction analysis might help in improving the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of NAFLD and other liver dysfunctions.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]