MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Improved left ventricular mass quantification with partial voxel interpolation: in vivo and necropsy validation of a novel cardiac MRI segmentation algorithm.
Author: Codella NC, Lee HY, Fieno DS, Chen DW, Hurtado-Rua S, Kochar M, Finn JP, Judd R, Goyal P, Schenendorf J, Cham MD, Devereux RB, Prince M, Wang Y, Weinsaft JW.
Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jan; 5(1):137-46. PubMed ID: 22104165.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) typically quantifies LV mass (LVM) by means of manual planimetry (MP), but this approach is time-consuming and does not account for partial voxel components--myocardium admixed with blood in a single voxel. Automated segmentation (AS) can account for partial voxels, but this has not been used for LVM quantification. This study used automated CMR segmentation to test the influence of partial voxels on quantification of LVM. METHODS AND RESULTS: LVM was quantified by AS and MP in 126 consecutive patients and 10 laboratory animals undergoing CMR. AS yielded both partial voxel (AS(PV)) and full voxel (AS(FV)) measurements. Methods were independently compared with LVM quantified on echocardiography (echo) and an ex vivo standard of LVM at necropsy. AS quantified LVM in all patients, yielding a 12-fold decrease in processing time versus MP (0:21±0:04 versus 4:18±1:02 minutes; P<0.001). AS(FV) mass (136±35 g) was slightly lower than MP (139±35; Δ=3±9 g, P<0.001). Both methods yielded similar proportions of patients with LV remodeling (P=0.73) and hypertrophy (P=1.00). Regarding partial voxel segmentation, AS(PV) yielded higher LVM (159±38 g) than MP (Δ=20±10 g) and AS(FV) (Δ=23±6 g, both P<0.001), corresponding to relative increases of 14% and 17%. In multivariable analysis, magnitude of difference between AS(PV) and AS(FV) correlated with larger voxel size (partial r=0.37, P<0.001) even after controlling for LV chamber volume (r=0.28, P=0.002) and total LVM (r=0.19, P=0.03). Among patients, AS(PV) yielded better agreement with echo (Δ=20±25 g) than did AS(FV) (Δ=43±24 g) or MP (Δ=40±22 g, both P<0.001). Among laboratory animals, AS(PV) and ex vivo results were similar (Δ=1±3 g, P=0.3), whereas AS(FV) (6±3 g, P<0.001) and MP (4±5 g, P=0.02) yielded small but significant differences with LVM at necropsy. CONCLUSIONS: Automated segmentation of myocardial partial voxels yields a 14-17% increase in LVM versus full voxel segmentation, with increased differences correlated with lower spatial resolution. Partial voxel segmentation yields improved CMR agreement with echo and necropsy-verified LVM.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]