These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Compliance with the CURB-65 score and the consequences of non-implementation.
    Author: Guo Q, Li HY, Zhou YP, Li M, Chen XK, Liu H, Peng HL, Yu HQ, Chen X, Liu N, Liang LH, Zhao QZ, Jiang M.
    Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2011 Dec; 15(12):1697-702. PubMed ID: 22118182.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The CURB-65 (confusion, urea >7 mmol/l, respiratory rate ≥ 30 breaths/min, low blood pressure and age ≥ 65 years) score is a simple, well-validated tool for the assessment of severity in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). It is unknown whether it is used routinely in China. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of use of the CURB-65 score in routine hospital practice and the consequences of non-implementation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical records from 1230 in-patients with CAP in a Chinese medical college-affiliated hospital. RESULTS: No CAP patient underwent the CURB-65 test at admission. Based on the British Thoracic Society guidelines, the 716 (58.2%) in-patients with a CURB65 score of 0 and the 402 (32.7%) in-patients with CURB-65 score of 1 should have received ambulatory treatment, whereas the 14 (1.2%) patients with CURB65 scores of ≥ 3 should have been admitted to the critical care unit. The maximum excess total annual costs for managing CAP patients with CURB-65 scores of 0 and 1 were estimated at respectively US$94 383.12 and US$66 313.92 in the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The CURB-65 scoring tool in patients with CAP was not applied in routine hospital practice, resulting in inappropriate hospitalisation and excess costs.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]