These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of cycloplegic refraction to the near retinoscopy technique for refractive error determination.
    Author: Wesson MD, Mann KR, Bray NW.
    Journal: J Am Optom Assoc; 1990 Sep; 61(9):680-4. PubMed ID: 2212460.
    Abstract:
    The near retinoscopy technique of refractive error determination was compared to the standard method of cycloplegic refraction using 10 "infants" (3-12 months of age) and 10 "children" (32-109 months of age). There was a significant difference between the techniques for both sphere and cylinder power. Although there was no interaction of refractive technique and age group, the difference between near retinoscopy and cycloplegic refractive error tended to be larger for infants than for children. No significant difference was found when the average refractive values were compared for monocular or binocular conditions and no significant effect was found for either gender or laterality (right versus left eye). Based on these findings, it is suggested that caution be used in substituting the near retinoscopy technique for cycloplegic refraction even utilizing a "correction" factor for the dioptric difference between techniques.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]