These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Dual-ports laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy compared with conventional laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy.
    Author: Kawamura H, Tanioka T, Funakoshi T, Takahashi M.
    Journal: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2011 Dec; 21(6):429-33. PubMed ID: 22146166.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: We performed laparoscopic gastrectomy using an umbilical port in addition with one other port (dual-ports laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy, DP-LADG) since December 2009. We describe a retrospective study to evaluate the possibility of DP-LADG compared with conventional LADG (C-LADG). METHODS: The indication for DP-LADG was preoperative clinical Stage IA gastric cancer. We compared 20 patients who underwent DP-LADG with 24 patients of clinical Stage IA patients who underwent C-LADG. RESULTS: The mean operation time was significantly longer for DP-LADG (250.5 min) than for C-LADG (197.5 min); however, the mean operation time for the last 5 patients undergoing DP-LADG (209 ± 31.1 min) was almost the same as that for C-LADG. There were no significant differences between DP-LADG and C-LADG in terms of blood loss, number of lymph nodes dissected, rates of conversion to open surgery, postoperative complications, and length of postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: DP-LADG is technically feasible.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]