These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic after aluminum oxide sandblasting and various laser treatments.
    Author: Akın H, Ozkurt Z, Kırmalı O, Kazazoglu E, Ozdemir AK.
    Journal: Photomed Laser Surg; 2011 Dec; 29(12):797-802. PubMed ID: 22150095.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments; sandblasting, Er:YAG, Nd:YAG, or CO(2) laser irradiation on the shear bond strength (SBS) of zirconia ceramic to dentin. BACKGROUND DATA: Zirconia is not properly luted with resin cements. Various surface treatment methods have been suggested for zirconia to obtain high bond strength to resin cements. There is no study that compared the effect of different laser types (Er:YAG, Nd:YAG, CO(2)) with sandblasting on SBS between zirconia and dentin. METHODS: One hundred and twenty human maxillary third molar teeth were sectioned 3 mm below the occlusal surfaces, embedded in a metal ring with autopolymerizing acrylic resin, and stored in distilled water at 37(0)C. One hundred and twenty disc-shaped zirconia specimens were fabricated (6 mm in diameter and 4 mm in thickness), and randomly assigned to six groups (n=20): Group 1, untreated (control); Group 2, sandblasted; Group 3, Er:YAG laser irradiated; Group 4, Nd:YAG laser irradiated with contact; Group 5, Nd:YAG laser irradiated with non-contact; Group 6, CO(2) laser irradiated. They were cemented onto the dentin with dual-cured resin cement (Variolink(®)). After they were stored in distilled water at 37(0)C for 24 h, the SBS test was performed at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The fractured specimens were examined under a stereomicroscope to evaluate the fracture pattern. RESULTS: Results of this study did not show statistically significant differences between Groups 1 and 2, or among Groups 3, 4 and 5. The lowest SBS was recorded in Group 6 (CO(2) laser), and the highest SBS was recorded in Group 4 (Nd:YAG laser with contact), followed by Group 3 (Er:YAG laser). The adhesive failure mode was predominantly observed in Groups 2, 3, 5, and 6. Group 1 showed 45% mixed failure and Group 4 showed 50% mixed failure. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that Er:YAG and Nd:YAG laser treatment increased the bond strength of zirconia compared to sandbasting and CO(2) laser treatment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]