These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Time to first compression using Medical Priority Dispatch System compression-first dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation protocols.
    Author: Van Vleet LM, Hubble MW.
    Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care; 2012; 16(2):242-50. PubMed ID: 22150694.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Without bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), cardiac arrest survival decreases 7%-10% for every minute of delay until defibrillation. Dispatcher-assisted CPR (D-CPR) has been shown to increase the rates of bystander CPR and cardiac arrest survival. Other reports suggest that the most critical component of bystander CPR is chest compressions with minimal interruption. Beginning with version 11.2 of the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) protocols, instructions for mouth-to-mouth ventilation (MTMV) and pulse check were removed and a compression-first pathway was introduced to facilitate rapid delivery of compressions. Additionally, unconscious choking and third-trimester pregnancy decision-making criteria were added in versions 11.3 and 12.0, respectively. However, the effects of these changes on time to first compression (TTFC) have not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: We sought to quantify the TTFC of MPDS versions 11.2, 11.3, and 12.0 for all calls identified as cardiac arrest on call intake that did not require MTMV instruction. METHODS: Audio recordings of all D-CPR events for October 2005 through May 2010 were analyzed for TTFC. Differences in TTFC across versions were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: A total of 778 cases received D-CPR. Of these, 259 were excluded because they met criteria for MTMV (pediatric patients, allergic reaction, etc.), were missing data, or were not initially identified as cardiac arrest. Of the remaining 519 calls, the mean TTFC was 240 seconds, with no significant variation across the MPDS versions (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Following the removal of instructions for pulse check and MTMV, as well as other minor changes in the MPDS protocols, we found the overall TTFC to be 240 seconds with little variation across the three versions evaluated. This represents an improvement in TTFC compared with reports of an earlier version of MPDS that included pulse checks and MTMV instructions (315 seconds). However, the MPDS TTFC does not compare favorably with reports of older, non-MPDS protocols that included pulse checks and MTMV. Efforts should continue to focus on improving this key, and modifiable, determinant of cardiac arrest survival.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]