These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Response patterns to bronchodilator and quantitative computed tomography in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Author: Lee JS, Huh JW, Chae EJ, Seo JB, Ra SW, Lee JH, Kim EK, Lee YK, Kim TH, Kim WJ, Lee JH, Lee SM, Lee S, Lim SY, Shin TR, Yoon HI, Sheen SS, Oh YM, Lee SD.
    Journal: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2012 Jan; 32(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 22152074.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) show different spirometric response patterns to bronchodilator, such that some patients show improvement principally in expiratory flow (forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FEV(1)), whereas others respond by improvement of lung volume (forced vital capacity; FVC). The mechanisms of these different response patterns to bronchodilator remain unclear. We investigated the associations between bronchodilator responsiveness and quantitative computed tomography (CT) indices in patients with COPD. METHODS: Data on a total of 101 patients with stable COPD were retrospectively analysed. Volume and flow responses to bronchodilator were assessed by FVC and FEV(1) changes before and after inhalation of salbutamol (400 μg). Volumetric CT was performed to quantify emphysema, air trapping and large airway thickness. Emphysema was assessed by the volume fraction of the lung under -950 Hounsfield units (HU; V(950)) at full inspiration and air trapping by the ratio of mean lung density (MLD) at full expiration and inspiration. Airway wall thickness and wall area percentage (WA%; defined as wall area/[wall area + lumen area] × 100), were measured near the origin of right apical and left apico-posterior bronchus. RESULTS: Among quantitative CT indices, the CT emphysema index (V(950 insp)) showed a significant negative correlation with postbronchodilator FEV(1) change (R = -0·213, P = 0·004), and the CT air-trapping index correlated positively with postbronchodilator FVC change(R = 0·286, P≤0·001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that CT emphysema index had independent association with postbronchodilator FEV(1) change and CT air-trapping index with postbronchodilator FVC change. CONCLUSION: The degrees of emphysema and air trapping may contribute to the different response patterns to bronchodilator in patients with COPD.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]