These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Improved visualization of renal lesions using three-dimensional ultrasound--a feasibility study.
    Author: Helck A, D'Anastasi M, Notohamiprodjo M, Thieme S, Reiser M, Clevert DA.
    Journal: Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2011; 49(1-4):537-50. PubMed ID: 22214725.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential benefit of three-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of renal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 21 patients with unclear renal findings were prospectively included in the study. Every patient was examined using two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound (US), X-plane technique (simultaneous display of main image and second image at a plane at right angles to the first), and real time three-dimensional (3D) US. The imaging model used were standard gray scale-, duplex- and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). All acquisitions were compared to each other with regard to image quality and identifiability of renal lesions. Additionally, when using the X-plane technique the quality of the first and the second image were analysed separately. The assessment was done using a subjective 6 point scale (1 = best). RESULTS: All acquisitions were successfully performed and no patient had to be excluded. Image quality of real time 3D-US (score: 2.4 ± 0.73) was slightly inferior to 2D-US and X-plane technique (main image) with a score of 2.2 ± 0.43 and 2.2 ± 0.5, respectively. The image quality of second image in the X-plane mode -due to a lower spatial resolution- was lower with a score of 3.2 ± 0.5. Real time 3D-US and X-plane technique allowed for better identifiability (score: 1.4 ± 0.59 and 1.9 ± 0.53) of renal lesions compared to 2D-US (score: 2.5 ± 0.6). The most marked difference was observed between the simultaneous use of real time 3D-US and X-plane technique versus 2D-US in case of renal cell carcinoma, especially with regard to extra-capsular tumor extension (score: 1.6 ± 0.52, 1.8 ± 0.71, and 3.0 ± 0.52, respectively). CONCLUSION: Assessment of renal lesions using real time 3D-US is feasible and improves the identifiability of renal lesions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]