These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cost analysis comparing adjuvant epimacular brachytherapy with anti-VEGF monotherapy for the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
    Author: Jackson TL, Kirkpatrick L, Tang G, Prasad S.
    Journal: Eye (Lond); 2012 Apr; 26(4):557-63. PubMed ID: 22261737.
    Abstract:
    AIMS: To consider the cost implication of adopting epimacular brachytherapy (EMB) for the treatment of neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (wAMD), compared with ranibizumab or bevacizumab monotherapy. METHODS: This analysis compared the cumulative 3-year costs of anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) monotherapy to EMB combined with anti-VEGF therapy. Two patient groups were considered: newly diagnosed (treatment-naïve) patients; and patients already receiving chronic anti-VEGF therapy. RESULTS: In the treatment-naïve patients, the highest cumulative treatment costs were associated with ranibizumab monotherapy (£25,658), followed by bevacizumab monotherapy (£16,177), EMB with ranibizumab (£14,002), then EMB with bevacizumab (£10,289). In previously treated patients, the highest treatment costs were ranibizumab monotherapy (£18,355), followed by EMB with ranibizumab (£17,428), bevacizumab monotherapy (£16,177), then EMB with bevacizumab (£12,129). CONCLUSION: EMB combined with anti-VEGF treatment has the potential to yield considerable cost savings, compared with anti-VEGF monotherapy. If the ongoing large studies of EMB confirm the published feasibility data, then adjuvant EMB may represent a cost-effective alternative to anti-VEGF monotherapy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]