These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Quantitative analysis of left ventricular dyssynchrony using cardiac computed tomography versus three-dimensional echocardiography.
    Author: Buss SJ, Schulz F, Wolf D, Hosch W, Galuschky C, Schummers G, Giannitsis E, Kauczor HU, Zugck C, Becker R, Hardt SE, Katus HA, Korosoglou G.
    Journal: Eur Radiol; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1303-9. PubMed ID: 22270144.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether cardiac computed tomography (CCT) can determine intraventricular dyssynchrony in comparison to real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) in patients who are considered for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). METHODS: 35 patients considered for CRT were examined. Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony was quantified by calculating the standard deviation index (SDI) of 17 myocardial LV segments by RT3DE and ECG-gated contrast-enhanced 64-slice dual-source CCT. For both analyses the same software algorithm (4D LV-Analysis) was used. RESULTS: Close correlations were observed for end-systolic volume, end-diastolic volume and LV ejection fraction between the two techniques (r = 0.94, r = 0.92 and r = 0.95, respectively, P < 0.001 for all). For the global dyssynchrony index SDI, a high correlation was found between RT3DE and CCT (r = 0.84, P < 0.001), which further increased after exclusion of segments with poor image quality by echocardiography (r = 0.90, P < 0.001). The required time for quantitative analysis was significantly shorter (162 ± 22 s vs. 608 ± 112 s per patient, P < 0.001) and reproducibility was significantly higher for CCT compared with RT3DE (interobserver variability of 4.5 ± 3.1% vs. 7.9 ± 6.1%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Quantitative assessment of LV dyssynchrony is feasible by CCT. Owing to its higher reproducibility and faster analysis time compared with RT3DE, this technique may represent a valuable alternative for dyssynchrony assessment. KEY POINTS: • Quantitative assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony is feasible by cardiac computed tomography (CCT). • This technique has been compared with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE). • Reproducibility is significantly higher for CCT compared with RT3DE. • Time spent for analysis is significantly shorter for CCT. • Computed tomography may represent a valuable alternative to ultrasound for dyssynchrony assessment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]