These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study.
    Author: Sinan H, Demirbas S, Ozer MT, Sucullu I, Akyol M.
    Journal: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Feb; 22(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 22318052.
    Abstract:
    This prospective randomized study compared single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with respect to estimated blood loss, operative time, postoperative pain levels, and complications. Thirty-four study patients were divided into 2 groups: 17 patients underwent SILC and 17 underwent LC. Operative time was longer for SILC than for LC, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the relationship of body mass index with operative time between SILC and LC (P=0.613, P=0.983, respectively). The 2 groups had no statistically significant differences with respect to visual analog scale scores, estimated blood loss, shoulder pain, or complications (P>0.05). SILC can be the treatment of choice for gallbladder disease. Although the surgeon's first several attempts at SILC require a longer operative time compared with LC, there are no differences in hospital length of stay, blood loss, complication rates, or pain scores between SILC and LC.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]