These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Medium-term clinical results of microsurgical lumbar flavectomy that preserves facet joints in cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of bilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression by a unilateral approach.
    Author: Nakanishi K, Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, Okuda T, Kamei N, Nakamae T, Izumi B, Ohta R, Fujioka Y, Ochi M.
    Journal: J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Oct; 26(7):351-8. PubMed ID: 22331069.
    Abstract:
    STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of medium-term results. OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique for posterior decompression using microsurgical lumbar flavectomy (MLF) without facetectomy, which is based on the anatomic features of the ligamentum flavum, and to examine the clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal spondylolisthesis with lower extremity symptoms rather than low back pain, who underwent this procedure by 2 different approaches. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterior decompression with fusion has been the optimal and standard operative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Alternatively, minimally invasive procedures have been used for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with favorable outcomes. METHODS: A bilateral laminotomy (BL group) was performed on 44 consecutive patients, and bilateral decompression by a unilateral approach (BDU group) was performed on 23 consecutive patients. The mean follow-up period was 7.0 years. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and recovery rate were obtained, and radiographic assessment was performed using plain radiograms on the lateral view while standing in flexion, neutral, and extension postures before surgery and at the final follow-up. RESULTS: The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at the final follow-up was improved in the BL and BDU groups, compared with that before MLF. The mean recovery rate was 72.4% and 68.4%, respectively. The mean % slip increased at the final follow-up, compared with that before surgery in both groups, except for the % slip in the extension posture in the BDU group. However, there was no significant difference in the dynamic % slip in the flexion-extension posture between before surgery and at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and radiologic parameters were not significantly different between the 2 groups. This technique of MLF using either approach did not increase the dynamic % slip and showed favorable medium-term clinical results in cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]