These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effect of a pacing mode preserving spontaneous AV conduction on ventricular pacing burden and atrial arrhythmias.
    Author: Rey JL, Quenum S, Hero M.
    Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 May; 35(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 22339661.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Using dual-chamber pacemakers with new algorithms: Manage Ventricular Pacing (MVP™), minimizes unnecessary ventricular pacing (VP). This function operates in AAI/R mode with backup VP during AV block. AIM: The aim of "Generation MVP" study was to assess the VP burden and atrial arrhythmias (AA) burden according to indication of pacing and MVP™ function programming of AdaptaDR implantable pacemaker (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). METHODS: The multicenter observational "Generation MVP" study included 220 patients aged 75.9 ± 11 years (men = 52%) implanted for sinus node dysfunction (SND; n = 115) or atrio-ventricular block (AVB; n = 105). Programming MVP function has been left to the physician's discretion. Percentage of VP and AA burden (percentage of time spent in AA) stored in memories were assessed at 2 and 10 months. RESULTS: 220 patients were followed at 2 months (174 MVP [On], 46 MVP [off]) and at 10 months (165 MVP [On], 55 MVP [off]). Median percentage of VP is significantly lower when MVP is programmed [On] versus [off] at 2 and 10 months follow-up for SND and AVB indications of pacing (P < 0.001). Finally, programming MVP function is performed at middle term (10 months) for 84% of patients with SND and 65% of patients with AVB: median percentage of VP is as low as 0.6% for patients with SND and 12% for patients with AVB versus 95% for SND and 99% for AVB when MVP function is programmed [off](P < 0.001). Median AA burden was significantly lower when MVP function was programmed [On] versus [off] at 2 months (8.7% vs 28%; P < 0.001) and 10 months (1% vs 22%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study programming MVP function decreases percentage of VP at 2 and 10 months for patients paced for SND or AVB. Moreover median AA burden is reduced when MVP function was programmed [On] vs [off] at two follow-ups.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]