These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Numerical approaches to determine the interface tension of curved interfaces from free energy calculations.
    Author: Tröster A, Oettel M, Block B, Virnau P, Binder K.
    Journal: J Chem Phys; 2012 Feb 14; 136(6):064709. PubMed ID: 22360217.
    Abstract:
    A recently proposed method to obtain the surface free energy σ(R) of spherical droplets and bubbles of fluids, using a thermodynamic analysis of two-phase coexistence in finite boxes at fixed total density, is reconsidered and extended. Building on a comprehensive review of the basic thermodynamic theory, it is shown that from this analysis one can extract both the equimolar radius R(e) as well as the radius R(s) of the surface of tension. Hence the free energy barrier that needs to be overcome in nucleation events where critical droplets and bubbles are formed can be reliably estimated for the range of radii that is of physical interest. It is found that the conventional theory of nucleation, where the interface tension of planar liquid-vapor interfaces is used to predict nucleation barriers, leads to a significant overestimation, and this failure is particularly large for bubbles. Furthermore, different routes to estimate the effective radius-dependent Tolman length δ(R(s)) from simulations in the canonical ensemble are discussed. Thus we obtain an instructive exemplification of the basic quantities and relations of the thermodynamic theory of metastable droplets/bubbles using simulations. However, the simulation results for δ(R(s)) employing a truncated Lennard-Jones system suffer to some extent from unexplained finite size effects, while no such finite size effects are found in corresponding density functional calculations. The numerical results are compatible with the expectation that δ(R(s) → ∞) is slightly negative and of the order of one tenth of a Lennard-Jones diameter, but much larger systems need to be simulated to allow more precise estimates of δ(R(s) → ∞).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]