These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: MLPA: a prenatal diagnostic tool for the study of congenital heart defects?
    Author: Mademont-Soler I, Morales C, Soler A, Clusellas N, Margarit E, Martínez-Barrios E, Martínez JM, Sánchez A.
    Journal: Gene; 2012 May 25; 500(1):151-4. PubMed ID: 22446045.
    Abstract:
    Congenital heart defects (CHD) represent the most common birth defects, so they are not a rare finding when performing routine ultrasound examinations during pregnancy. Once chromosome abnormalities have been excluded in a fetus with a CHD, chromosome 22q11.2 deletion is usually investigated by FISH, as it is the most frequent microdeletion syndrome and is generally associated with cardiac malformations. If 22q11.2 microdeletion is ruled out, the etiology of the CHD remains generally unexplained, making familial genetic counseling difficult. To evaluate the usefulness of Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) kits designed for the study of 22q11.2 and other genomic regions previously associated with syndromic CHD, we performed MLPA in 55 pregnancies with fetuses presenting CHD, normal karyotype and negative FISH results for 22q11.2 microdeletion, which constitutes the largest prenatal series reported. Definitive MLPA results were obtained in 50 pregnancies, and in this setting such MLPA kits did not detect any imbalance. On the other hand, to compare FISH and MLPA techniques for the study of 22q11.2 microdeletions, we performed MLPA in 4 pregnancies known to have 22q11.2 deletions (by FISH). All four 22q11.2 microdeletions were also detected by MLPA, which corroborates that it is a reliable technique for the diagnosis and characterization of 22q11.2 deletions. Finally, we evaluated the possibility of replacing conventional FISH by MLPA for the prenatal diagnosis of CHD, comparing the diagnostic potential, results delivery times, repetition and failure rates and cost of both techniques, and concluded that FISH should still be the technique of choice for the prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with CHD.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]