MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Load independence of two-dimensional speckle-tracking-derived left ventricular twist and apex-to-base rotation delay in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: implications for left ventricular dyssynchrony assessment.
Author: Kim HK, Chang SA, Ahn HS, Shin DH, Kim JH, Lee SP, Kim YJ, Cho GY, Sohn DW, Oh BH, Park YB.
Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2012 Jun; 25(6):652-60. PubMed ID: 22465871.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) twist mechanics are a promising, sensitive tool for assessing pathophysiologic changes in patients with systolic heart failure. Although LV twist is known to be load dependent in healthy volunteers, this has not been examined in patients with "long-standing" dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The aim of this study was to determine whether LV twist remains load dependent in the setting of long-standing, nonischemic DCM. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with DCM with baseline LV ejection fractions (LVEFs) < 40% and 13 subjects with preserved LVEFs (≥50%) were enrolled. After baseline measurements, pneumatic compression of the lower extremities (Pcom) was used to increase LV afterload. Subsequently, sublingual nitroglycerin (SL-NG) was administered to modify preload. Conventional echocardiographic parameters, LV end-systolic wall stress, net LV twist angle, and apex-to-base-rotation delay (ABRD) were assessed under each condition. RESULTS: In patients with DCM, although LV end-systolic wall stress significantly increased under Pcom (196.9 ± 64.9 g/m(2) at baseline vs 231.8 ± 78.9 g/m(2) under Pcom, P < .017) and decreased after SL-NG application (231.8 ± 78.9 g/m(2) under Pcom vs 197.4 ± 67.4 g/m(2) after SL-NG, P < .017), net LV twist angle and ABRD showed no significant changes depending on LV loading condition (for LV twist, 7.63 ± 4.47° at baseline vs 7.03 ± 4.13° under Pcom vs 7.35 ± 4.36° after SL-NG, P = 0.65; for ABRD, 16.56 ± 13.81% at baseline vs 17.19 ± 14.81% under Pcom vs 15.95 ± 13.27% after SL-NG, P = .53). Careful examination of individual patient data revealed that LV twist was load independent when patients had LV twist < 12°. ABRD was also found to be load independent, but only in patients with LVEFs < 34%. In contrast, LV twist and ABRD were load dependent in patients with preserved LVEFs. CONCLUSIONS: LV twist and its component, ABRD, had relatively load insensitive properties in patients with long-standing DCM and can be used in future clinical trials as load-independent indexes of LV dyssynchrony.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]