These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Heart rate variability analysis of single-channel electrocardiogram can help to differentiate high-risk patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome - a study on diagnostic accuracy.
    Author: Karasulu L, Dalar L, Sökücü S, Altın S.
    Journal: Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2012 Jun; 12(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 22484710.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of heart rate variability analysis (HRV) analysis from the long duration electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings as a screening test for the diagnosis of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). METHODS: Recordings from 87 patients who were admitted to sleep laboratory for polysomnographic study (PSG) were evaluated. Finally 30 cases with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)≥15/hour included in patient's group (male/female: 22/8; mean age: 49±10 years) and 21 cases with AHI<5 were included in control group (male/female: 10/11; mean age: 48±11 years). From the ECG recordings taken as a part of PSG, time -domain and frequency -domain HRV parameters were evaluated and their accuracy in the diagnosis of OSAS was investigated using ROC analysis. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found in HRV variables in time- domain parameters such as SDNN, SDNN index; frequency-domain parameters VLF, LF, nuLF, nuHF, LF/HF and geometric parameter HRV triangular index values in between groups. Cut- off value of 16 for the HRV triangular index was found to be 50% sensitive and 85.7% specific with a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 3.50% and negative LR of 0.58% When the total power was higher than 9.611, then the analysis sensitivity was 53.3%, specificity was 95.6%, positive LR was 11.2% and negative LR was 0.49% When the SDNN was higher than 83 then its sensitivity was 80%, specificity was 76.2%, positive LR was 3.36% and negative LR was 0.26% For the cut off value of 62 calculated for SDNN index, sensitivity was 73.3%, specificity was 85.7%, positive LR was 5.13% and negative LR was 0.31%, for the cut off value of 9.12 was calculated for VLF, sensitivity was 90.4% specificity was 50% positive LR was 1.81% and negative LR was 0.19%. CONCLUSION: Heart rate variability analysis done over routine single channel ECG data gathered through routine Holter applications may be helpful in distinguishing moderate-to-severe OSAS patients from mild OSAS patients and non-OSAS control subjects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]