These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Dynamic CT angiography after abdominal aortic endovascular aneurysm repair: differences in contrast agent dynamics in the aorta and endoleaks--preliminary results.
    Author: Lehmkuhl L, Andres C, Lücke C, Foldyna B, Grothoff M, Scheinert D, Nitzsche S, Gutberlet M.
    Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2012 Jun; 23(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 22494657.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To assess differences in aortic and endoleak enhancement in patients after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with dynamic computed tomography (CT) angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients (mean age, 74.5 y ± 6; range, 61-88 y) with endoleaks after EVAR of the abdominal aorta were examined on a second-generation dual-source CT unit with 10 unidirectional scan phases (temporal resolution, 5 s; 80 kV; 120 reference-mAs; z-axis field of view, 283 mm), followed by a venous scan phase. Enhancement was assessed in aorta and endoleaks for all phases by density measurements. The diagnostic reliability of endoleak detection was assessed on a five-point confidence scale. RESULTS: In total, 26 endoleaks (type I, n = 1; type II, n = 25) were detected. The highest detection rate was found in phase 5 (22 s after threshold; P < .01 vs other dynamic phases). Mean peak aortic enhancement (560 HU ± 96) was present in an early arterial phase (phase 3, 12 s after threshold), whereas the mean peak endoleak enhancement (398 HU ± 174) for type II endoleaks was present later, in phase 4 (17 s after threshold). Despite perceived high diagnostic confidence in phases 1 and 2 (ie, typical arterial phase of biphasic CT protocol), only 23% and 62% of endoleaks were detected, respectively, whereas peak diagnostic confidence (phases 4 and 5) corresponded well with the maximum endoleak detection rate but decreased significantly in later phases (ie, 6-10). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary dynamic CT angiography results in post-EVAR follow-up revealed notably different peaks of endoleak and aortic enhancement, which are not covered sufficiently by conventional biphasic CT protocols. Phase 5 demonstrated the highest type II endoleak detection rate, with high diagnostic confidence.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]