These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Three-dimensional dual-phase whole-heart MR imaging: clinical implications for congenital heart disease.
    Author: Hussain T, Lossnitzer D, Bellsham-Revell H, Valverde I, Beerbaum P, Razavi R, Bell AJ, Schaeffter T, Botnar RM, Uribe SA, Greil GF.
    Journal: Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 22517963.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To identify which rest phase (systolic or diastolic) is optimum for assessing or measuring cardiac structures in the setting of three-dimensional (3D) whole-heart imaging in congenital heart disease (CHD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was obtained. Fifty children (26 male and 24 female patients) underwent 3D dual-phase whole-heart imaging. Cardiac structures were analyzed for contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and image quality. Cross-sectional measurements were taken of the aortic arch, right ventricular (RV) outflow tract (RVOT) and pulmonary arteries. Normally distributed variables were compared by using paired t tests, and categorical data were compared by using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Mean CNR and image quality were significantly (all P < .05) greater in systole for the right atrium (CNR, 8.9 vs 7.5; image quality, 438 vs 91), left atrium (CNR, 8.0 vs 5.3; image quality, 1006 vs 29), RV (CNR, 10.6 vs 8.2; image quality, 131 vs 23), LV (CNR, 9.4 vs 7.7; image quality, 125 vs 28), and pulmonary veins (CNR, 6.2 vs 4.9; image quality, 914 vs 32). Conversely, diastolic CNR was significantly higher in the aorta (9.2 vs 8.2; P = .013) and diastolic image quality was higher for the left pulmonary artery (238 vs 62; P = .007), right pulmonary artery (219 vs 35; P < .001), and for imaging of an area after an arterial stenosis (164 vs 7; P < .001). All aortic arch and RVOT cross-sectional measurements were significantly (P < .05) greater in systole (narrowest point of arch, 70 vs 53 mm(2); descending aorta, 71 vs 58 mm(2); transverse arch, 293 vs 275 mm(2); valvar RVOT, 291 vs 268 mm(2); supravalvar RVOT, 337 vs 280 mm(2); prebifurcation RVOT, 329 vs 259 mm(2)). CONCLUSION: Certain structures in CHD are better imaged in systole and others in diastole, and therefore, the dual-phase approach allows a higher overall success rate. This approach also allows depiction of diameter changes between systole and diastole and is therefore preferable to standard single-phase sequences for the planning of interventional procedures.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]