These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion-tensor imaging in renal tissue under hydration and furosemide flow challenges. Author: Sigmund EE, Vivier PH, Sui D, Lamparello NA, Tantillo K, Mikheev A, Rusinek H, Babb JS, Storey P, Lee VS, Chandarana H. Journal: Radiology; 2012 Jun; 263(3):758-69. PubMed ID: 22523327. Abstract: PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility and the distribution of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and diffusion-tensor (DT) imaging parameters in healthy renal cortex and medulla at baseline and after hydration or furosemide challenges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant protocol with written informed consent, IVIM and DT imaging were performed at 3 T in 10 volunteers before and after water loading or furosemide administration. IVIM (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], tissue diffusivity [D(t)], perfusion fraction [f(p)], pseudodiffusivity [D(p)]) and DT (mean diffusivity [MD], fractional anisotropy [FA], eigenvalues [λ(i)]) imaging parameters and urine output from serial bladder volumes were calculated. (a)Reproducibility was quantified with coefficient of variation, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman limits of agreement; (b) contrast and challenge response were quantified with analysis of variance; and (c) Pearson correlations were quantified with urine output. RESULTS: Good reproducibility was found for ADC, D(t), MD, FA, and λ(i) (average coefficient of variation, 3.7% [cortex] and 5.0% [medulla]), and moderate reproducibility was found for D(p), f(p), and f(p) · D(p) (average coefficient of variation, 18.7% [cortex] and 25.9% [medulla]). Baseline cortical diffusivities significantly exceeded medullary values except D(p), for which medullary values significantly exceeded cortical values, and λ(1,) which showed no contrast. ADC, D(t), MD, and λ(i) increased significantly for both challenges. Medullary diffusivity increases were dominated by transverse diffusion (1.72 ± 0.09 [baseline] to 1.79 ± 0.10 [hydration] μm(2)/msec, P = .0059; or 1.86 ± 0.07 [furosemide] μm(2)/msec, P = .0094). Urine output correlated with cortical ADC with furosemide (r = 0.7, P = .034) and with medullary λ(1) (r = 0.83, P = .0418), λ(2) (r = 0.85, P = .0301), and MD (r = 0.82, P = .045) with hydration. CONCLUSION: Diffusion MR metrics are sensitive to flow changes in kidney induced by diuretic challenges. The results of this study suggest that vascular flow, tubular dilation, water reabsorption, and intratubular flow all play important roles in diffusion-weighted imaging contrast.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]