These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Judet osteoperiosteal decortication for treatment of non-union: the Cornwall experience.
    Author: Guyver P, Wakeling C, Naik K, Norton M.
    Journal: Injury; 2012 Jul; 43(7):1187-92. PubMed ID: 22542168.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The treatment of non union can be challenging with a variety of surgical options available to achieve bone consolidation. Robert Judet first described a method of osteo-periosteal decortication in 1963. He stated that by elevating cortical chips that remain attached to the periosteum and overlying soft tissues surrounding the site of non-union, combined with mechanical support, the bone consolidated. Despite excellent results presented in 2008 of 99% union rates with a mean delay of 8 months, the technique has not yet become popularised. We aim to show that Judet's method of decortication can achieve good results in the management of failure of union in a hospital other than Judet's. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed from December 2002 to December 2008 of 40 cases in 39 patients of osteoperiosteal decortication for fracture non-union. Concurrent stabilisation was with internal fixation only. All procedures were performed by one surgeon (MN) using the Judet technique after learning the technique in the originators hospital. A preoperative non union scoring system was also used to assess its use in predicting persistent non-union. RESULTS: Union was successfully achieved in 36 of the 39 surviving cases (92.3%) after a median delay of 8 months (range 3-47, SD 9.2) Twenty-six patients (65%) achieved union following the decortication procedure without subsequent operations. Factors such as open fracture and smoking did not have a statistically significant effect on union. The mean number of procedures following decortication was 0.68 (range 0-4). Metalwork failure occurred in 11 cases (28%), the majority in femoral decortications (n=9, 82%). The femur was the site of all persistent non unions in the series. Three patients had superficial infections and two had deep infections. The pre-operative non union scoring system (0-100) means were noticeably worse for the persistent non union group 42.0 (20-46) compared with the union group 31.0 (range 4-52). CONCLUSIONS: Osteoperiosteal decortication remains a highly effective surgical technique in the management of failed fracture union. The non union scoring system is a reliable predictor of persistent non union after this type of surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Relevant to general trauma orthopaedic surgeon and specialist orthopaedic surgeons with an interest in fracture non-union.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]