These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Molecular-scale structure of uranium(VI) immobilized with goethite and phosphate. Author: Singh A, Catalano JG, Ulrich KU, Giammar DE. Journal: Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jun 19; 46(12):6594-603. PubMed ID: 22612235. Abstract: The molecular-scale immobilization mechanisms of uranium uptake in the presence of phosphate and goethite were examined by extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy. Wet chemistry data from U(VI)-equilibrated goethite suspensions at pH 4-7 in the presence of ~100 μM total phosphate indicated changes in U(VI) uptake mechanisms from adsorption to precipitation with increasing total uranium concentrations and with increasing pH. EXAFS analysis revealed that the precipitated U(VI) had a structure consistent with the meta-autunite group of solids. The adsorbed U(VI), in the absence of phosphate at pH 4-7, formed bidentate edge-sharing, ≡ Fe(OH)(2)UO(2), and bidentate corner-sharing, (≡ FeOH)(2)UO(2), surface complexes with respective U-Fe coordination distances of ~3.45 and ~4.3 Å. In the presence of phosphate and goethite, the relative amounts of precipitated and adsorbed U(VI) were quantified using linear combinations of the EXAFS spectra of precipitated U(VI) and phosphate-free adsorbed U(VI). A U(VI)-phosphate-Fe(III) oxide ternary surface complex is suggested as the dominant species at pH 4 and total U(VI) of 10 μM or less on the basis of the linear combination fitting, a P shell indicated by EXAFS, and the simultaneous enhancement of U(VI) and phosphate uptake on goethite. A structural model for the ternary surface complex was proposed that included a single phosphate shell at ~3.6 Å (U-P) and a single iron shell at ~4.3 Å (U-Fe). While the data can be explained by a U-bridging ternary surface complex, (≡ FeO)(2)UO(2)PO(4), it is not possible to statistically distinguish this scenario from one with P-bridging complexes also present.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]