These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
    Author: Jedrzejczak WW, Kochanek K, Trzaskowski B, Pilka E, Skarzynski PH, Skarzynski H.
    Journal: Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) and tone-burst evoked otoacoustic emissions (TBOAEs) in identifying the residual hearing of subjects with partial deafness (PD)--a condition in which subjects have normal thresholds at low frequencies and severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss at high frequencies. DESIGN: Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) were measured in 23 subjects with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, 46 with PD, and 15 with normal hearing (NH). The PD subjects were divided into three subgroups according to the frequency at which hearing loss started: PD250 (NH up to 250 Hz)--20 ears; PD500 (NH to 500 Hz)--18 ears; and PD1000 (NH up to 1000 Hz)--20 ears. Standard-click stimuli, and 0.5- and 1-kHz tone bursts (average amplitude 80 ± 3 peak dB SPL, nonlinear averaging protocol), were used. The tone bursts were four cycles long with equal rise/fall times and no plateau. Recordings were performed in two acquisition windows: a standard one 20-msec wide for clicks and 1-kHz tone bursts, and one 30-msec wide for 0.5-kHz tone bursts. OAE response levels, signal-to-noise ratios, and reproducibility were examined in terms of wide-band responses and in terms of half-octave bands centered at 0.5 and 1 kHz. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to determine which type of stimuli best differentiates partially deaf subjects from subjects with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss through the range 125 to 8000 Hz. RESULTS: Nearly all recordings from groups PD500 and PD1000 showed 0.5-kHz TBOAEs. By contrast, 1-kHz TBOAEs and CEOAEs were generally found only in the PD1000 group. It was also possible to detect 0.5-kHz TBOAE responses in approximately 50% of ears from the PD250 group. Receiver operator characteristic analysis demonstrated that click and 1-kHz tone bursts provide a good diagnostic measure of residual hearing even when hearing loss starts as low as 1 kHz; moreover, the 0.5-kHz TBOAE could identify residual hearing when hearing loss started just > 0.5 kHz, a situation in which clicks failed to elicit a response. In the case of partially deaf subjects, diagnosis was more accurate when OAEs were analyzed by 1/2 octave bands. Furthermore, the use of a 0.5-kHz tone burst gave responses in the highest number of subjects, even when there were hearing losses in neighboring bands. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that a 0.5-kHz TBOAE is a more powerful test than the standard CEOAE when cochlear function at low frequencies is of interest. The 0.5-kHz TBOAE may be used to identify partial deafness in patients who generally fail to show a response to the commonly used clicks. In addition, use of 1/2 octave-band filtering can increase the reproducibility and power of the test.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]