These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The effects of different types of individually ventilated caging systems on growing male mice.
    Author: Kostomitsopoulos N, Alexakos P, Eleni K, Doulou A, Paschidis K, Baumans V.
    Journal: Lab Anim (NY); 2012 Jun 20; 41(7):192-7. PubMed ID: 22718240.
    Abstract:
    Ventilation rate and turnover rate of dry air vary among different types of ventilation systems used with individually ventilated cages (IVCs) and can affect the well-being of rodents housed in these cages. The authors compared the effects of two types of IVC systems, forced-air IVCs and motor-free IVCs, on 4-week-old C57Bl/6J male mice. The mice were acclimatized to the cages for 8 d and then monitored for 87 d. Their body weights, food and water consumption and preferred resting areas were recorded. Mice that were housed in motor-free IVCs had a significantly greater increase in body weight than those housed in forced-air IVCs, despite having similar food consumption. Mice in forced-air IVCs had greater water consumption than mice in motor-free IVCs. In addition, mice in forced-air IVCs were more frequently located in the front halves of their cages, whereas mice in motor-free IVCs were located with similar frequency in the front and back halves of their cages, perhaps because of the higher ventilation rate or the location of the air inlets and outlets in the rear of the cage. These results suggest that body weight, food and water consumption and intracage location of growing male mice are influenced by the type of ventilation system used in the cages in which the mice are housed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]