These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Is an implant always necessary after enucleation?].
    Author: Smit T, Koornneef L.
    Journal: Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(5):533-6. PubMed ID: 2272589.
    Abstract:
    A retrospective study was performed on 114 patients who had received an intraorbital ball implant after removal of an eye: 44 had a primary implant inserted at the time of enucleation and 70 a secondary implant, inserted at a later date. We observed distinct advantages in the primary implantation group. Patients with a primary implant, an acrylic ball covered with sclera inserted within Tenon's capsule, had better cosmetic results and a lower complication rate and fewer needed any other therapeutic measures. Of the patients with primary implants 89% did not require further treatment, as against 51% with secondary implants.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]