These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Presacral extramedullary haematopoiesis: A diagnostic update and case report of a late diagnosis.
    Author: Denies E, Duwel V, Delvaux P.
    Journal: Int J Surg Case Rep; 2012; 3(9):474-6. PubMed ID: 22750087.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: We report a rare case of presacral extramedullary haematopoiesis, which manifested as a tumoural mass on a routine ultrasonography in a patient presenting with symptoms of cholecystitis. Since Ask-Upmark in 1945 reported 3 cases of pelvic extramedullary haematopoiesis, we are aware of only published 14 additional cases. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 73-year-old female patient presented with abdominal pain in the right hypochondrium. An abdominal ultrasonography revealed cholecystitis with cholecystolithiasis and a coincidental hyperreflective mass of 9.5cm was visualised behind the bladder. A clinical examination identified a mass in the pelvis that could be palpated vaginally. A computerised tomography scan showed a large presacral, inhomogeneous, multilobular and nodular tumour. The patient was admitted for laparoscopic resection of the gall bladder and laparoscopic exploration of the presacral mass. An anatomopathological examination of the tissue revealed the presence of extramedullary haematopoietic tissue. A postoperative haematological investigation indicated that the extramedullary haematopoiesis was idiopathic. DISCUSSION: Presacral EMH may occasionally present with symptoms of nerve compression. Symptoms of haematologic disorders may accompany EMH. Barium enema, abdominal ultrasound, CT scan, MRI and radionuclide bone marrow imaging have all been used by previous authors in establishing the diagnosis. Tissue samples may be misdiagnosed when atypical megakaryocytes are misinterpreted as malignant cells, which occurred in this case. Misdiagnosis can occur even more often when EMH is not considered in the differential diagnosis due to its rare occurrence. In this case, the final diagnosis was made tissue sampling after surgery. Treatment of EMH is only necessary when it is symptomatic. CONCLUSION: This case report shows that extramedullary haematopoiesis is very rare and that it is a difficult diagnostic challenge when its location is unusual and when it is not associated with a haematologic disorder. Together with this case report, we present an update of the available diagnostic methods.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]