These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Oxygen-conserving effect of the diving response in the immersed human.
    Author: de Bruijn R, Richardson M, Schagatay E.
    Journal: Diving Hyperb Med; 2009 Dec; 39(4):193-9. PubMed ID: 22752738.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: The human cardiovascular diving response has been shown to have an oxygen-conserving effect during simulated breath-hold diving by apnoea with face immersion. However, it is not known if facial immersion enhances the response to the same extent as that in the diver with the body immersed and if this leads to oxygen conservation. METHODS: Seventeen subjects each completed a total of 12 apnoeas of fixed, near-maximal duration. Four series of three apnoeas were conducted: dry body with apnoea (DA), dry body with face-immersion apnoea (DFIA), immersed body with apnoea (IA), and immersed body with face-immersion apnoea (IFIA). Air and water temperatures were 23 degrees Celcius. Heart rate, skin blood flow, arterial blood pressure, arterial haemoglobin saturation, lung volume and end-tidal fractions of carbon dioxide and oxygen were recorded non-invasively. RESULTS: Face immersion led to a greater reduction in heart rate during apnoea, regardless of body immersion (DA-DFIA 9.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.54, 0.1; IF-IFIA 7.9%, 95% CI 4.8, 0.2). Both DFIA and DA resulted in skin vasoconstriction, which was more pronounced during DFIA (16%, 95% CI 8.4, 0.3). During body immersion, skin vasoconstriction was reduced considerably, and neither IA nor IFIA reduced blood flow further. Mean arterial pressure increased more in the immersed condition than on dry land. Arterial saturation remained higher after DFIA (0.4%, 95% CI 0.2, 0.01) and IFIA (0.4%, 95% CI 0.4, 0.01) series, suggesting an oxygen-conserving effect of the more powerful diving response associated with face immersion. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the oxygen-conserving effect of the diving response in the immersed diver is the same as that observed in the dry, horizontal, simulated diving model.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]